Hi,
It is our practice to rename SAP standard roles we plan to use "as is" to our company's naming convention. I am being told by an Mii implementer that Mii uses the standard role names in objects and that by changing these names to our convention, I will create "complications" in their implementation process. I find this hard to believe, it would be a departure from what (little) I know about SAP and how they handle authorizations and roles. It also seems to be very limiting when it comes to customization in the future.
Is this true? Does Mii name standard roles inside of objects? (These "objects" were not clearly defined to me and I plan on calling a meeting so they may show me examples.)
Anyone else on Mii have this issue?