Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - Security
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5338

Usage of SU22 for "Addons"

$
0
0

Hi,

 

we have developed an addon module on our SAP dev system which is distributed to various customers.

 

According to note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1539556 Point 5 I have maintained authorization proposals for all of our t-codes in SU22.

With the download function I have created a text file which I then provided to the customers to upload it into their system landscape.

 

When trying to upload the file in "test mode" either in our own system or in the customers' systems the upload report (RSU22UPLD) outputs

"File does not contain any records that match selection".

 

In the debugger it becomes obvious that this is because the upload file only contains entries for USOBX_C and USOBT_C but none for

TSTC_SM or USOB_SM.

 

So I checked the contents of these two tables on our dev system with regard to our t-codes and there are indeed no entries.

 

As the code in form routine transfer_content of the upload report states, it expects some kind of "header info" (TSTC oder USOB_SM) entries before the subsequent entries of USOBX, USOBX_C and so on.

 

WHEN gc_tab_usobx OR gc_tab_usobx_c OR

          gc_tab_usobt OR gc_tab_usobt_c.

*    we need the object key check only for RFC-functions here. All other

*    object types are allready checked (header in TSTC/USOB_SM,USOBHASH)

       lv_type pv_line+30(2).

       IF lv_type = type_rf.

         lv_objkey_flag = gc_true.

       ELSE.

         CLEAR lv_objkey_flag.

       ENDIF.

 

So, does anyone have an idea what's going wrong?


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 5338

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>