Hi Yves,
thank you very much for the explanation. I understand, however I still have some doubts. For example the transaction KA03 - "Display Cost Element" is designed to show cost element master data. What can be the sense of checking S_TABU_DIS or S_PROJECT for this transaction, i.e. for a transaction presenting master data of a cost element? And these objects are checked in SU24, however not proposed.
May I ask you two more questions in this area?
Do you know the reason for putting authorization objects on the SU22 list in case they are not checked (e.g. transaction KKF6N, Object C_FVER_WRK)? Have these objects AUTHORITY-CHECK-clauses in this program? If an AUTHORITY-CHECK clause does not exist for an authorization object in the program, would it bring any results adding this object to SU24 manually with the option "check"?
And what is the difference between using in SU24 the proposal option "Yes, without values" (e.g. transaction KO88, object S_ALV_LAYO) and the proposal option "Yes" with leaving the fields empty? What is the reason of using the option "Yes, without values" at all ?
I will be very grateful for any explanations.
With best regards,
Robert